Arguments Against The Turing Test - amusing phrase
Philosophical background[ edit ] The question of whether it is possible for machines to think has a long history, which is firmly entrenched in the distinction between dualist and materialist views of the mind. For we can easily understand a machine's being constituted so that it can utter words, and even emit some responses to action on it of a corporeal kind, which brings about a change in its organs; for instance, if touched in a particular part it may ask what we wish to say to it; if in another part it may exclaim that it is being hurt, and so on. But it never happens that it arranges its speech in various ways, in order to reply appropriately to everything that may be said in its presence, as even the lowest type of man can do. Descartes therefore prefigures the Turing test by defining the insufficiency of appropriate linguistic response as that which separates the human from the automaton. Descartes fails to consider the possibility that future automata might be able to overcome such insufficiency, and so does not propose the Turing test as such, even if he prefigures its conceptual framework and criterion. According to dualism, the mind is non-physical or, at the very least, has non-physical properties [12] and, therefore, cannot be explained in purely physical terms. According to materialism, the mind can be explained physically, which leaves open the possibility of minds that are produced artificially. Arguments Against The Turing TestGeneral Studies — 2 Topic: Welfare schemes for vulnerable sections of the population by the Centre and States and the performance of these schemes; mechanisms, laws, institutions and Bodies constituted for the protection and betterment of these vulnerable sections.
Directive: Elucidate — Give a detailed account as to how and why it occurred, or what is the Arghments context. You must be defining key terms where ever appropriate, and substantiate with relevant associated facts. Structure of the answer: Start with brief narration of Article Then present an overview of judicial interventions.
Account for the arguments for pardon law.]
I apologise, but it not absolutely approaches me. Perhaps there are still variants?
It seems remarkable idea to me is
Yes, really. And I have faced it. Let's discuss this question. Here or in PM.