Analysis Of The Brock Turner Rape Case.
The Case Of Moses Sithole
Citations: 91 Cal. July 30, As Modified on Denial of Rehearing August 28, Review Denied November 14, Camps and Sharon G. Birenba, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent. This appeal raises three challenges to the admissibility of statistical calculations based on DNA evidence.
We conclude none of them has merit and that the procedures at issue have gained general acceptance in the scientific community. A jury convicted appellant of several burglaries and sexual offenses Caee against multiple victims during a nine-month period, and he was sentenced to 77 years in prison. With respect to two of the sex crimes charged, the jury heard forensic DNA evidence identifying appellant as the perpetrator.
Please Sign In or Register
He challenges the admission of this evidence on appeal, claiming it should have been excluded pursuant to People v. Kelly 17 Cal. Specifically, appellant argues: 1 the formula used by the California Department of Justice Anallysis to calculate the statistical significance of DNA matches is not generally accepted in the http://pinsoftek.com/wp-content/custom/summer-plan-essay/romeo-and-juliets-attitude-towards-women.php community because it fails to consider laboratory error rates; 2 the DOJ's formula for calculating statistical significance of DNA matches determined by polymerase chain reaction PCR analysis is not generally accepted in the scientific community; and 3 the DOJ's "fixed-bin" technique for determining the statistical probability of a DNA match violates correct scientific procedures because the bins are too small.
Appellant also raises several "non-DNA" claims.
He contends the evidence was insufficient to prove sexual battery in one charge and attempted robbery in another. He also claims the trial court erred in failing to link the jury sua sponte on lesser included offenses, with respect to the robbery convictions, and in calculating his sentence.
We conclude the trial court properly admitted the DNA Caae. However, the judgment must be modified to remedy minor instructional and sentencing errors.
Stanford Rape Case Study
Sexual Assaults 1. Linda H. One night in Novemberyearold Linda H. She was not feeling well and went to bed in her clothes. She awoke around a.]
I advise to you to come on a site where there is a lot of information on a theme interesting you. Will not regret.
Remarkably! Thanks!
In it something is. I will know, many thanks for an explanation.