Kants Theoretical Analysis
Moral Argument in Kant's Theory of Deontology
Main article: Kantian ethics Kantian ethics are Theireticalrevolving entirely around duty rather than emotions or end goals. All actions are performed in accordance with some underlying maxim or principle, which are vastly different from each other; it is Kants Theoretical Analysis to this that the moral worth of any action is judged. Kant's ethics are founded on his view of rationality as the ultimate good and his belief that all people are fundamentally rational beings. This led to the most important part of Kant's ethics, the formulation of the categorical imperativewhich is the criterion for whether a maxim is good or bad.
Simply put, this criterion amounts to a thought experiment : to attempt to universalize the maxim by imagining a world where all people necessarily acted in more info way in the relevant circumstances and then see if the maxim and its associated action would still be conceivable in such a world. For instance, holding the maxim kill anyone who annoys you and applying it universally would result in self termination. Thus holding this maxim is irrational as it ends up being impossible to hold it. Universalizing a maxim statement leads to it being valid, Kants Theoretical Analysis to one of two contradictions—a contradiction in conception where the maxim, when Analysks, is no longer a viable means to the end or a contradiction in will where the will of a person contradicts what the universalisation Kants Theoretical Analysis the maxim implies.
The first type leads to a "perfect duty", and the second leads to an "imperfect duty". Kant's ethics focus, then, only on the maxim that underlies actions, and judges these to be good or bad solely on how they conform to reason. Kant showed that many of our common sense views of what is Kants Theoretical Analysis or bad conform to his system, but denied that any action performed for reasons other than rational actions can be good saving someone who is drowning simply out of a great pity for http://pinsoftek.com/wp-content/custom/stamps/duska-disagrees-with-mill-case-study.php is not a morally good act.
Kant also denied that the consequences of an act in any way contribute to the moral worth of that act, his reasoning being highly simplified for brevity that the physical world is outside our full control, and thus we cannot be held accountable for the events that occur in it. The formulations of the categorical imperative : Act only according to that maxim whereby you can, at the Kants Theoretical Analysis time, will that it should become a universal law.
For example, John Rawls [4] [5] drew heavily on his inspiration in setting out the basis for a liberal view of political institutions.]
I congratulate, it seems remarkable idea to me is
The helpful information