Abraham Lincoln And The Self-Made Myth Analysis
Terminology[ edit ] The exact term "American exceptionalism" was occasionally used in the 19th century. American communists started using the English term "American exceptionalism" in factional fights. The term was later moved into general use by intellectuals.
Its uniqueness is explained by any or all of a variety of reasons: history, size, geography, political institutions, and culture. Explanations of the growth of government in Europe are not expected to fit American experience, and vice versa. Roberts and DiCuirci ask: Why has the myth of American exceptionalism, characterized by a belief in America's highly distinctive features or unusual trajectory based on the abundance of its natural resources, its revolutionary origins and its Protestant religious culture that anticipated God's blessing of the nation, held such tremendous staying power, from its influence in popular culture to its critical role in foreign policy?
Bernard Bailyna leading colonial specialist at Harvard, is a believer in the distinctiveness of American civilization. Although he rarely, if ever, uses the phrase "American exceptionalism," he insists upon the "distinctive characteristics of British North American life. Some claim the phrase "American exceptionalism" originated with the Communist Party USA in an English translation of a condemnation that was made in by Abraham Lincoln And The Self-Made Myth Analysis Soviet leader Joseph Stalin against communist supporters of Jay Lovestone for the latter's heretical belief the US was independent of the Marxist laws of history "thanks to its natural resources, industrial capacity, and absence of rigid class distinctions.
Early examples of the term's usage include a declaration made at the American Communist convention that proclaimed "the storm of the economic crisis in the United States blew down the house of cards of American exceptionalism. Their strictly Puritanical origin, their exclusively commercial habits, even the country they inhabit, which seems to divert their minds from the pursuit of science, literature, and the arts, the proximity of Europe, which allows them to neglect these pursuits without relapsing more info barbarism, a thousand special causes, of which I have only been able to Abraham Lincoln And The Self-Made Myth Analysis out the most important, have singularly concurred to fix the mind of the American upon purely practical objects.
His passions, his wants, his education, and everything about him seem to unite in drawing the natives of the United States earthward; his religion alone bids him turn, from time to time, a transient and distracted glance to heaven. Let us cease, then, to view all democratic nations Analyiss the example of the American people. American exceptionalism has fueled American expansion through the ideology of manifest destiny. WellsG. Chestertonand Hilaire Belloc and that they did so in complimentary terms. From the s Abraham Lincoln And The Self-Made Myth Analysis the late 19th century, the McGuffey Readers sold million copies and were studied by most American students. Skrabec argues the Readers "hailed American exceptionalism, manifest destinyand America as God's country Furthermore, McGuffey saw America as having a future mission to bring liberty and democracy to the world.
He noted the increasing strength of American capitalism and the country's "tremendous reserve power" and said that they both prevented a communist revolution. Joseph Smith argued that the millennial New Jerusalem was to be built in America 10th Article of Faith and reported God as saying "it is not Self-MMade that any man should be in bondage click to another.
Henry Nash Smith stressed the theme of "virgin land" in the American frontier that promised an escape from the decay that had befallen earlier republics. Absence of feudalism[ edit ] Many scholars use a model of American exceptionalism developed by Harvard political scientist Louis Hartz.
Navigation menu
The "liberal consensus" school, typified by David PotterDaniel Boorstinand Richard Hofstadter followed Hartz in emphasizing that political conflicts in American history remained within the tight boundaries of a liberal consensus regarding private propertyindividual rightsand representative government. The national government that emerged was far less centralized or nationalized than its European http://pinsoftek.com/wp-content/custom/newspeak/benedict-de-spinozas-ethics-in-17th-rationalism.php. They believed that God had made a covenant with their people and had chosen them to provide a model for the other nations of the Earth.]
It is very a pity to me, that I can help nothing to you. I hope, to you here will help. Do not despair.
It is remarkable, it is the amusing information
Quite, yes
What necessary phrase... super, magnificent idea
Willingly I accept. The question is interesting, I too will take part in discussion. I know, that together we can come to a right answer.