Created with Sketch. Of the numerous battles fought on Indian soil, there is none more pivotal than the Battle of http://pinsoftek.com/wp-content/custom/summer-plan-essay/aristotles-rhetoric.php Fought between the forces of the British East India Company The Mughal History: Short Story: Aisan Daulat Begum Nawab Sirajuddaulah Asian Bengal, this victory gave the Company a foothold in Bengal, from where it established a massive empire that would stretch from the borders of Afghanistan all the way to Burma.
Even though this battle was a turning point in the Shorrt of the Indian subcontinent, most people view it as just another battle, where a small British force defeated the much larger Bengal army due to the treachery of Mir Jafar and the Jagat Seths. But, like so much in history, there is nothing simplistic about this battle. The book offers a fascinating insight into the life and motivations of a number of characters in the drama, such as Robert Clive, Nawab Sirajuddaulah, Mir Jafar and the Jagat Seths. It is as if each of them has their own story to tell. He brings out different versions of the same event, pointing out how versions are important as they shape perceptions and, in fact, how some versions are deliberately created to shape perceptions. The truth lies somewhere in between. There are several http://pinsoftek.com/wp-content/custom/summer-plan-essay/walter-rauschenbusch-the-social-movement-in-the-united-states.php questions that Chakravarti attempts to answer in the book: Was it a battle or was it won before it began, as some historians surmise?
What were the politics at the time that led to Plassey?
Posts navigation
What was the attraction of the plains and rivers of Bengal versus the homes and balance sheets of Europe? Was the incident of the Black Hole of Calcutta that was used by some to morally underpin the British expedition to Plassey, real, exaggerated or fictional? How does that incident and Plassey carry forward to this day, as the present remembers the past in various versions of living history?
Chakravarti attempts to answer these questions in his book by looking at a variety of sources, in India and Europe. These sources include contemporary accounts of British East India Company officials to contemporary histories, research papers, biographies, essays and articles. Most importantly, a number of Bengali sources have been referenced, which most non-Bengali historians have overlooked.
All these factors make the book a rivetting read. No contribution is too small and it will only take a minute. We thank you for pitching in. Given to debauchery and prone to bouts of cruelty, the young Nawab, Sirajuddaulah, alienated almost the entire Murshidabad court.
Navigation menu
Sirajuddaulah had also alienated European powers and launched a particularly destructive siege and invasion of the British settlement in Calcutta. This set off a chain of events that culminated in the Battle of Plassey in and the subsequent British control over Bengal.
Excerpts: The Battle of Plassey is one of the most famous battles in Indian history. When so much has already been written about it, why did you feel the need to embark on this book? Indeed, a lot has been written about the Battle of Plassey, but quite a lot of it is pure pamphleteering for either the British or the subcontinental cause; quite a lot of it is an emotional The Mughal History: Short Story: Aisan Daulat Begum and not a clinical one; and many Indian textbooks are, frankly, greatly challenged when it Sgort to Plassey. There was—is—a need for corrective history, if you will, the need to peel away layers to expose the truths and lies, the myths and the nuances. The descriptions of hapless Siraj, crafty Clive and traitorous Mir Jafar cannot be the only absolutes, because they are not. Besides, the back story of Plassey, which is a mix of aggressive mercantilism Begu with geopolitics, is often diminished, as is the cast of characters—dramatis personae—in and around Plassey.
With so many different versions of the same event, why did you attempt to put together a balanced view? Because a balanced view is, to my mind, the appropriate way to treat history, especially an event as pivotal to Indian history, in some ways even to British and Asian history, as Plassey.
A balanced history is also the crucial need of the times, with so much partisan rewriting of history, so much whitewashing or saffron-washing of history taking place. In most books on this subject, Nawab Sirajuddaulah has either been portrayed as an absolute villain or as a tragic hero.]
I apologise, but, in my opinion, you commit an error. I can prove it. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
I understand this question. I invite to discussion.