The Judgment At Nuremberg Film Analysis - pinsoftek.com Custom Academic Help

The Judgment At Nuremberg Film Analysis

The Judgment At Nuremberg Film Analysis Video

The Judgment At Nuremberg Film Analysis.

He writes regular columns for People's Journal and Malaya.

The Judgment At Nuremberg Film Analysis

A military tribunal was set up to try them for their crimes against humanity. Set in Nuremberg, Germany inthe lead defendant in the trial is Ernst Janning Burt Lancaster and his defense attorney is Hans Rolfe Maximillian Schell, who won the Oscar best actor award for his performance. The opening scene showing the devastation and ruins on the bombed out city sets the tone for the bleak film that runs for nearly three hours. While trying the case, Judge Haywood becomes the friend of a widow Marlene Dietrich of a German general who was executed by Allied Forces who owns the house where he now stays.

He also gets to talk with other Germans to learn their own views about the war.

Navigation menu

The other three defendants have each their own reason. One actually believes in Nazi policies. Another was just following orders. The last one was just scared. There were 12 such trials held in post-war Germany and the caption in the title credits says that the 99 war criminals sentenced to prison were all eventually freed by the time the film was shown in The film is well acted by the big cast.

Post navigation

Richard Widmark is very credible in his emotion-packed opening statement as prosecuting lawyer Col. Tad Lawson at the start of the trial calling http://pinsoftek.com/wp-content/custom/stamps/abercrombie-and-fitch-swot-analysis.php the harshest punishments for the erring judges.

Giving great support are Dietrich as the aristocratic Judgmeht who owns the house where Haywood stays and Garland as a woman falsely convicted for allegedly having sexual relations with a Jew and polluting the Nazi master rac.

The Judgment At Nuremberg Film Analysis

He interprets his part so intensely, arguing that by judging that the judges are guilty for upholding the laws of their country, this would be like saying that all Germans must be tried as most citizens turned a blind eye to the Nazi regime. He also rightfully says that the U. He cited many instances of U. The characters are written with depth and the many moral ramifications of the case are expounded. All of them are given their own highlight.

The Judgment At Nuremberg Film Analysis

The opening scene is quite bombastic, showing the swastika sign on top of a building then blowing it into beats, which was what happened to Hitler. This is a fate he deserved after what he did to the 6 million Jews he and his men killed in the Holocaust which was shown in footage presented as evidence to the court. Posted by.]

One thought on “The Judgment At Nuremberg Film Analysis

Add comment

Your e-mail won't be published. Mandatory fields *