![[BKEYWORD-0-3] Emmy Helmers 1912 Speech Analysis](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/news/2021/04/18/TELEMMGLPICT000255488052_trans_NvBQzQNjv4Bqf1s-wQoVbeXjDqs54TYD_s4XN55P4yRyFkQINc0TJ14.jpeg?imwidth=480)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3636d/3636d96ee6031fe9b628876c75680a661298ac07" alt="Emmy Helmers 1912 Speech Analysis Emmy Helmers 1912 Speech Analysis"
Scott Walker, James R. Scott, Judith Neumann and Rodney G. Pasch, Defendants-Appellants. Opinion filed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06fe6/06fe662c005be693acef38f02ad40bd55f2c11a4" alt="Emmy Helmers 1912 Speech Analysis Emmy Helmers 1912 Speech Analysis"
Van Hollen, attorney general, and Kevin St. John, deputy attorney general, Steven P. Means, executive assistant attorney general, and http://pinsoftek.com/wp-content/custom/newspeak/how-did-martin-luther-king-jr-influence-civil-rights.php C. Kilpatrick, assistant attorney general. Oral argument by J. Van Hollen and Kevin St. For the plaintiff-respondents, there was a brief by Lester A. Pines, Lee Cullen, Tamara B. Packard, Susan M. Nicol Padway, Aaron A. Pines, Tamara B. Packard, and M. Nicol Padway.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8474/c84749c6b8985ead488cde5cacaca46868c7e031" alt="Emmy Helmers 1912 Speech Analysis Emmy Helmers 1912 Speech Analysis"
An amicus curiae brief was filed by Michael P. May, city attorney, and John W.]
I regret, that I can not help you. I think, you will find here the correct decision.
I assure you.