Corliss V. Finders Law Case Summary - pinsoftek.com Custom Academic Help

Corliss V. Finders Law Case Summary Video

Johnson v. State Case Brief Summary - Law Case Explained Corliss V. Finders Law Case Summary

Document Meta Data

Alexander and Stanford J. Alexander have entered into a voting agreement pursuant to which, among other things, such shareholders have agreed to vote their respective Company Common Shares as defined below in favor of the Merger; WHEREAS, for U. Section 1. The charter of Parent as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be the charter of the Surviving Corporation. The bylaws of Parent as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be the bylaws of the Surviving Corporation. Subject to Section 5.

Navigation menu

Prior to the Closing, the Board of Directors of Parent shall adopt resolutions to give effect to this Section 1. It is intended that, for U. In addition to the Corliss V. Finders Law Case Summary described in Section 2. At the Effective Time, as a result of the Merger and without any action on the part of the Parties or any holder of any shares of capital stock of Parent or the Company, each Excluded Share issued and article source immediately prior to the Effective Time shall cease to be outstanding, shall be canceled without payment of any consideration therefor and shall cease to exist.

Prior to the Effective Time, the Company shall not, without the prior written consent of Parent, make any payment with respect to, or settle or compromise or offer to settle or compromise, any such demand, or agree to do any of the foregoing. At the Effective Time, each share of capital stock of Parent issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall remain outstanding as a share of capital stock of the Surviving Corporation and shall not be affected by the Corliss V. Finders Law Case Summary. Section 2. In addition, in the event that the Exchange Fund shall be insufficient to pay the Cash Consideration, cash in lieu of any fractional shares payable pursuant to Section 2. Parent shall cause the Exchange Agent to make, and the Exchange Agent shall make delivery of the Merger Consideration, including payment of the cash in lieu of any fractional shares payment pursuant to Section 2.

Such Merger Consideration, including cash in lieu of any fractional shares payable pursuant to Section 2.]

One thought on “Corliss V. Finders Law Case Summary

Add comment

Your e-mail won't be published. Mandatory fields *