Comparison Of Mcgregors X And Y Theory - opinion
. Comparison Of Mcgregors X And Y Theory.In his book, The Human Side of Enterprise, McGregor proposed two theories by which managers perceive and address employee motivation. He referred to these opposing motivational methods as Theory X and Theory Y management.
However, beyond this commonality, the attitudes and assumptions they embody are quite different. Theory X According to McGregor, Theory X management assumes the following: Work is inherently distasteful to most people, and they will attempt to avoid work whenever possible. Most people are not ambitious, have little desire for responsibility, and prefer to be directed. Most people have little aptitude for creativity in solving organizational problems. Most people are self-centered. As a result, they must be closely controlled and often coerced to achieve organizational objectives.
Most people resist change. Most people are gullible and unintelligent. Essentially, Theory X assumes that the primary source of employee motivation is monetary, with security as a strong second. Under Theory X, one can take a hard or soft approach to getting results. The hard approach to motivation relies on coercion, click here threats, micromanagement, and tight controls— essentially an environment of command and control.
The soft approach, however, is to be permissive and seek harmony in the hopes that, in return, employees will cooperate when asked. However, neither of these extremes is optimal. The hard approach results in hostility, purposely low output, and extreme union demands.
The soft approach results in a growing desire for greater reward in exchange for diminished work output. It might seem that the optimal approach to human resource management would lie somewhere between these extremes. However, McGregor asserts that neither approach is appropriate, since the Comparison Of Mcgregors X And Y Theory assumptions of Theory X are incorrect. Once those needs have been satisfied, the motivation disappears. As a result, the only way that employees can attempt to meet higher-level needs at work is to seek more compensation, so, predictably, they focus on monetary rewards. While money may not be the most effective way to self-fulfillment, it may be the only way available. People will use work to satisfy their lower needs and Mcgrsgors to satisfy their higher needs during their leisure time.
However, employees can be most productive when their work goals align with their higher-level needs.
Post navigation
McGregor makes the point that a command-and-control environment is not effective because it relies on lower needs for motivation, but in modern society those needs are mostly http://pinsoftek.com/wp-content/custom/stamps/pro-death-penalty-arguments.php and thus are no longer motivating. In this situation, one would expect employees to dislike their work, avoid responsibility, have no interest in organizational goals, resist change, etc. To McGregor, a steady supply of motivation seemed more likely to occur under Theory Y management.
Theory Y The higher-level needs of esteem and self-actualization are ongoing needs that, for most people, are never completely satisfied. As such, it is these higher-level needs through which employees can best be motivated. In strong contrast to Theory X, Theory Y management makes the following assumptions: Work can be as natural as play if the conditions are favorable. People will be self-directed and creative to meet their work and organizational objectives if they are committed to them.
People will be committed to their quality and productivity objectives if rewards are in place that address higher needs such as self-fulfillment. The capacity for creativity spreads throughout organizations. Most people can handle responsibility because creativity and ingenuity are common in the population.]
Quite right! It seems to me it is very excellent idea. Completely with you I will agree.
Now all became clear, many thanks for an explanation.
I apologise, but, in my opinion, you commit an error. Let's discuss.
Bravo, what necessary phrase..., a brilliant idea