Tamir Rice Case Study - opinion
For once, a jury agreed. Their verdict, a landmark decision, could see Chauvin imprisoned for up to 40 years. The jury had deliberated for about 11 hours in all. Their decision is not a panacea, as many people from grassroots activists to former President Obama emphasized. There is abundant evidence of inequities that riddle the justice system. They will not be erased by the verdict.Tamir Rice Case Study - for that
During the trial of former police officer Derek Chauvin the country relived the pain and anger caused by the public death of Mr Floyd after the 9 minutes and 29 seconds he spent pinned under the knee of the former police officer. Here, The Independent looks back at some of those shocking killings and what happened to the officers responsible for them. Chauvin, 45, was found guilty of second-degree murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter at the end of the trial on 20 April In Minnesota, second-degree murder carries a maximum sentence of 40 years in prison. Third-degree murder is punishable by up to 25 years in prison. Second-degree manslaughter is punishable by up to 10 years in prison. Chauvin was immediately taken into custody and will be sentenced in early June, eight weeks after his conviction.Tamir Rice Case Study Video
Tamir Rice Shooting: Video Timeline - The New York Times Tamir Rice Case StudyWatching it along with the jury, the question that kept coming up for me is why? Why did Chauvin do it? Ultimately, the trial should be seen, not just as the trial of a rogue police officer, but as http://pinsoftek.com/wp-content/custom/life-in-hell/r-v-cassills-the-first-day-of-school.php trial of policing in the context of systemic racial segregation and racial dehumanization.
Search form
I am a professor of constitutional law at Cleveland Marshall College of Law in Cleveland—a big Midwestern city with policing issues of its own. My scholarship has focused on issues of systemic racial inequality and segregation.
As such, I have to try to help my students from many diverse backgrounds make sense of what happened to George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and other Black Americans killed by police. As it turns out, understanding the trial requires understanding where it is taking place.
How can jurors empathize with Chauvin and see the incident from his perspective if they simply cannot make sense of his actions? For that reason, the possibility of a conviction seems at least possible, if not likely.
When witnesses Stuy down in tears as they recall how they helplessly watched Chauvin slowly kill Floyd, it is impossible not to empathize with them and with Floyd. Rice was playing by himself at a park, holding an airsoft pellet gun, when a police cruiser drove up to him. Two officers jumped out of the vehicle and one of them shot Rice twice.
Newsletter
Rice immediately fell to the ground, lifeless. The entire incident took two seconds. The police officer in the Tamir Rice killing claimed that he thought Rice was dangerous and posed a lethal threat. He claimed that the situation required quick, instinctive action, and he took it. Ina grand jury declined to indict here. Other than race, is there anything connecting the Rice and Floyd killings?]
It is cleared
I recommend to look for the answer to your question in google.com