Paleys Intelligent Design Argument - here
April 19, , am 1 I really need to know from expert scientists whether this experiment could potentially test for a Universal common designer existing in biology. Both combined make a Universal mind. If this hypothesis is true, the designer would have to exist in all possible conditions or worlds to create and sustain all possible manifestations of life. There are two sets of experiments that need to be performed to truly verify this prediction. When the conscious observer chooses a reaction environment to experiment on, the observer has to first test and determine whether or not life can be produced within that condition solely by allowing the natural conditions or processes to potentially produce specified complexity. The Miller-Urey and Lenski experiments would be great examples of how we have tested this, as far as I am concerned. Then, another experiment must be performed that simulates almost the exact same natural condition, but the experimenter would guide these natural mechanisms or processes to produce specified complexity. For example, whenever unguided chemical processes under atmospheric conditions were left to themselves without any interference, they did not produce the desired results. They were able to solve this problem by tying the molecules onto a substrate to make sure the pool of RNA molecules do not diffuse and form intermolecular reactions, and, thus, safely incubated.Alone!: Paleys Intelligent Design Argument
| HOW IT FEELS TO BE COLORED ME BY ZORA NEALE HURSTON | 698 |
| RULES IN AYN RANDS ANTHEM | 323 |
| Paleys Intelligent Design Argument | 935 |
Paleys Intelligent Design Argument Video
Paleys Intelligent Design Argument.The fist one was the ontological Intelligeht, which was formed by Saint Anselm. Anselm deduces the existence of God from the mere idea we have a God. Next we learned about the intelligent design argument in which specified complexity is a type of information that is a key sign of intelligence and the universe has specified complexity and must have an intelligent designer.]
One thought on “Paleys Intelligent Design Argument”