Kan Kants Principle Of Morality Essay
Attached reading information also. For example, they may have lied, broken a promise, stolen, harmed someone innocent, or even murdered, but done so with good intentions. Note: this last part is crucial: make sure you explain what it was that they did that would otherwise be morally questionable.
Also, it need not be someone you think is a hero.
The Ethics Of The Lifeboat Ethics
Many examples are given in the guidance Katns the readings, including people like Robin Hood, Edward Snowden, etc. Is what the person did moral, or immoral, according to the CI? Do you agree with this evaluation of the action? If you agree, how would you explain to the person in your own words why what they did was wrong? Briefly explain in your own words what you think Kant means by that.
Consider a specific example from the world of business, either Kan Kants Principle Of Morality Essay that you have directly encountered or one you heard about, in which a company honored this principle, and consider an example Esay which a company failed to honor this principle.
If you find the example from a source on the Internet or in an article be sure to share that with your classmates. Is it ever morally permissible to lie to someone? Describe a circumstance in which it seems that lying might make more people happy than telling the truth.
Would lying be the right thing to do in that circumstance, or is it our moral duty to tell the truth, even then? Then, offer your own perspective.
The Culture Of The And The Tempest By William Shakespeare
If you agree with Kant, consider and respond to an objection to his view. If you disagree with Kant, explain why. Discuss the positive and negative aspects of deontological theory as it relates to another of the theories you have encountered in this course. Think of an example in which someone perhaps you acted out of a sense of duty, even though by doing so one caused greater harm than if one had not acted, one failed to prevent harm from occurring, or one failed to bring about greater happiness.
Navigation menu
Then, explain whether you think that a this person was right to do that despite the negative consequences; b it was wrong for this person to act in this way, despite the fact that it was their moral duty to do so; or b this person was mistaken about what their duty really was.
Be sure to back up your answer with argument and references Kantd the text. Kant famously states that the only thing good without qualification is a good will.
Do you agree with Kant?]
I have removed this message
I consider, that you commit an error. I can prove it. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
What necessary words... super, a brilliant phrase