The Stanley Milgram Experiment - not present
Rich one, poor one By Derek Davey After a year of immense change, the divide between the haves and the have nots remains frustratingly the same Governments know most people obey — especially in a state of disaster By Bert Olivier on 29 March The tendency to obey orders seems to be ingrained in people, judging by the outcomes of two infamous experiments carried out by social scientists in the 20th century. Zimbardo decided to carry out the Stanford prison experiment because he wanted to explore further, in situational terms, what had been uncovered by Milgram nine years earlier, when the latter set out to test the limits of obedience to authority figures on the part of participants. The latter, in turn, increasingly showed all the signs — stress, extreme anxiety and depression — of people who felt helpless in the face of intransigent authority. The result was that the experiment, which had been planned to last for two weeks, had to be terminated after only six days. What one seems to be able to infer from this is that, when one receives instructions from someone in authority to perform certain actions, regardless of how unacceptable these seem to the one receiving the commands, one is likely to carry them out because the responsibility seems to be transferred to the one s who issued them. The Stanley Milgram Experiment
The Stanley Milgram Experiment Video
Milgram Obedience StudyGet me out of here. Let me out of here. Let me out. Do you hear? Get me out. Let me out, I tell you.
You have no right to hold me here. Let me out!
Post navigation
Let me out of here! Although all of the participants gave the initial mild levels of shock, responses varied after that. Some refused to continue after about volts, despite the insistence of the experimenter to continue to increase the shock level. Still others, however, continued The Stanley Milgram Experiment present the questions, and to administer the shocks, under the pressure of the experimenter, who demanded that they continue. In sum, well over half of the Mlgram who participated had, as far as they knew, shocked another person to death, all as part of a supposed experiment on learning. In the replication, however, the participants were not allowed to go beyond the volt shock switch.
Rather, he felt that it was the social situation, and not the people themselves, that was responsible for the behavior.
Milgram’s Studies on Obedience to Authority
The Stanley Milgram Experiment To demonstrate this, Milgram conducted research that explored a number of variations on his original procedure, each of which demonstrated that changes in the situation could dramatically influence the amount of conformity. These variations are summarized in Figure 7. Figure 7. In one replication the status of the experimenter was reduced by having the experiment take place in a building located in Bridgeport, Connecticut, rather than at the labs on the Yale University campus, and the research was ostensibly sponsored by a private commercial research firm instead of by the university.
And if two experimenters were The Stanley Milgram Experiment but only one proposed shocking while the other argued for stopping the shocks, all the research participants took the more benevolent advice and did not shock. Perhaps most telling regarding the important role of the situation were the studies in which Milgram allowed the participants to choose their own shock levels or in which one Milhram the experimenters suggested that they should not actually use the shock machine. In these situations, there was virtually no shocking. These conditions show that people do not like to harm others, and when given a choice they will not.
On the other hand, the social Stanlley can create powerful, and potentially deadly, social influence. Can our understanding of the social psychological factors that produce conformity and obedience help us explain the events that occurred in at Abu Ghraib, the Iraqi prison in which U. The social psychologist Philip Zimbardo thinks so.
Photo of an Iraqi prisoner being tortured by soldiers at the Abu Ghraib prison.]
I think, that you commit an error. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM.
In my opinion you commit an error. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.
I recommend to look for the answer to your question in google.com
The excellent and duly answer.