Effective Communication Analysis Video
It's Not Manipulation, It's Strategic Communication - Keisha Brewer - TEDxGeorgetown Effective Communication Analysis
Abduction[ edit ] Abduction is drawing a conclusion using a heuristic that is likely, but not inevitable given some foreknowledge. For example: I observe sheep in a field, and they appear white from my viewing angle, so sheep are white.
Brainstorm
Contrast with the deductive statement: Some sheep are white on at least one side. Critical thinking and rationality[ edit ] Effective Communication Analysis S. Waltersan emeritus philosophy professor from Gettysburg Collegeargues that rationality demands more than just logical or traditional methods of problem solving and analysis or what he calls the "calculus of justification" but also considers " cognitive acts such as imaginationconceptual creativity, intuition and insight" p. These "functions" are focused on discovery, on more abstract processes instead of linear, rules-based approaches to problem-solving.
The linear and non-sequential mind must both be engaged in the rational mind. But so is the ability to be flexible and consider non-traditional alternatives and perspectives. These complementary functions are what allow for critical thinking to be a practice encompassing imagination and intuition in cooperation with traditional modes of deductive inquiry.
According to Reynoldsan individual or group engaged in a strong way of critical thinking gives due consideration to establish for instance: [33] Evidence through reality Context skills to isolate the problem from context Relevant criteria for making the judgment well Applicable methods or techniques for forming the judgment Applicable theoretical constructs for understanding the problem and the question at hand In addition to possessing strong critical-thinking skills, Effective Communication Analysis must be disposed to engage problems and decisions using those skills. Critical thinking employs not only logic but broad intellectual criteria such as clarity, credibilityaccuracyprecision, relevancedepth, breadthsignificance, and fairness. Critical Effective Communication Analysis therefore need to have reached a level of maturity in their development, possess a certain attitude as well as a set of taught skills.
Introduction
There is a postulation by some writers that Ana,ysis tendencies from habits of mind should be thought as virtues to demonstrate the characteristics of a critical thinker. However, these virtues have also been criticized Effective Communication Analysis skeptics, who argue that there is lacking evidence for this specific mental basis that are causative to critical thinking.
Glaser proposed that the ability to think critically involves three elements: [35] An attitude of being disposed to consider in a thoughtful way the problems and subjects that come within the range of one's experiences Knowledge of the methods of logical inquiry and reasoning Some skill in applying those methods. Educational programs aimed at developing critical thinking in children and adult learners, individually or in group problem solving and decision making Anaalysis, continue to address these Effective Communication Analysis three central elements.
The Critical Thinking project at Human Science Lab, Londonis involved in the scientific study of all major educational systems in prevalence today to assess how the systems are working to promote or impede critical thinking. The psychological theory disposes of the absolute nature of the rational mind, in reference to conditions, abstract problems and discursive limitations.]
Today I was specially registered at a forum to participate in discussion of this question.
Almost the same.
It is a pity, that now I can not express - it is very occupied. I will be released - I will necessarily express the opinion.