They are his own and we are presenting the coverage because this trial could be of interest to our members and to generate thought and discussion. Overview Today saw the testimony of only one witness, but it was a witness of great importance to the defense, and therefore one whose testimony the state would perceive as important to damage. This was the defense medical expert witness Dr. David Fowler, a retired forensic pathologist. To not bury the lead, Dr. Fowler did what the defense needed done today, and did it well. So, overall, a good day for the defense today, when they very much needed one, especially after the weak performance of defense expert witness Barry Brodd yesterday. Fowler in some detail in Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee Film Analysis moment, but first let me touch upon a couple of housekeeping matters that were addressed this morning prior to the jury being brought into the court room.
First, the defense finally made its motion for acquittal, the prosecution argued against that motion, and Judge Cahill denied the motion. This was all entirely predictable. So, that took care for the motion for acquittal, as expected. There were various arguments made at various times about the extent to which it might be possible to have the defense subpoena Hall into this trial to testify, but in the end that was all resolved this morning.
Shop by category
Hall asserted a blanket 5th Amendment privilege to any and all questions he might be asked having anything to do with George Floyd on May 25,Judge Cahill acknowledged that privilege, and thus expired any hope the defense might have had to get Hall on the witness stand. Defense Expert Witness Dr. Fowler was a very solid expert witness for the defense today, and generally presented as extremely experienced and competent. Despite the accent, Fowler had worked as a forensic pathologist for a couple of decades, primarily in various senior medical examiner type roles for the state of Maryland.
Before we dive in further, recall that the prosecution really has to prove two distinct arguments in order to win a conviction on the legal merits in this case. That alone, however, is not enough. As noted, Fowler did a reasonably good job today. Whether it was sufficient to Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee Film Analysis needs of the defense, ultimately only the jury can decide.
My sense was that this was in effect a business designed to more info high-end scientific consultancy to the legal community. This arrangement also allows any single member of the business to involve others with distinct scientific expertise to inform their own scientific analysis, providing a much broader base of scientific expertise than any individual was likely to possess.
Shop with confidence
Now with the defense presenting its case in chief, the mission for defense counsel Nelson is to establish reasonable doubt on either of those arguments. And that opinion is: George Floyd had a sudden cardiac arrythmia due to atherosclerotic and hypertensive heart disease, during his restraint by the police.
In his direct questioning of Fowler defense counsel Eric Nelson touched upon a broad array of issues where the prosecution during its case in chief had raised apparent vulnerabilities for the defense. Indeed, even in a legal context a homicide is not always a crime.]
I think, that you are mistaken. I can defend the position.
Tomorrow is a new day.
It is remarkable, rather amusing opinion
It is a pity, that I can not participate in discussion now. I do not own the necessary information. But this theme me very much interests.