Stanford Prison Experiment Literature Review - for explanation
In no time, more than 70 students volunteered, and 24 were chosen. Movies and documentaries have been made, books published, and studies produced about those six days. What was learned and at what cost? What is still being learned? The Stanford Historical Society sponsors a look back at the controversial study with its leader, social psychologist Philip Zimbardo, Stanford Professor Emeritus of Psychology. Stanford Prison Experiment Literature Review
Its objective was to investigate the psychological effects of perceived power.
Post navigation
After volunteering for the experiment with the prospect of making 15 dollars a day in mind, students are randomly assigned the role of either a prison guard or a prisoner in the makeshift prison located in the basement of Jordan Hall. The cast take to their roles like cream to coffee, bringing Exprriment stifling sense of entrampent to life and sharing it generously with us, the viewers.
As we watch the gradual collapse of the mind, we are treated to invasive camera shots that impound us in both roles. We are made aware of the immersiveness of the viewing experience when we struggle with the guilt of identifying with the scowl-adorning guards one minute, and begging for mercy as the prisoners the next. As exciting, chilling and disturbing as the film is, it also contains elements of humor.
Admittedly, they serve to make us feel culpable for seeing the light in the unfolding darkness. The script is also witty when necessary, and ominous when least expected, adding to the duality of the social psychology experiment. After all, true power rests in the hands of Zimbardo himself.]
In my opinion it is obvious. I recommend to you to look in google.com