Immanuel Kant: The Existence Of True Enlightenment - question
John Stuart Mill wrote: "The Categories, or Predicaments—the former a Greek word, the latter its literal translation in the Latin language—were believed to be an enumeration of all things capable of being named, an enumeration by the summa genera highest kind , i. These are supposed to be the qualities or attributes that can be affirmed of each and every thing in experience. Any particular object that exists in thought must have been able to have the Categories attributed to it as possible predicates because the Categories are the properties, qualities, or characteristics of any possible object in general. The Categories of Aristotle and Kant are the general properties that belong to all things without expressing the peculiar nature of any particular thing. Kant appreciated Aristotle's effort, but said that his table was imperfect because " … as he had no guiding principle, he merely picked them up as they occurred to him Immanuel Kant: The Existence Of True Enlightenment
Main article: Kantian ethics Kantian ethics are deontologicalrevolving entirely around duty rather than emotions or end goals. All actions are performed in accordance with some underlying maxim or principle, which are vastly different from each other; it is according to this that the moral worth of any action is judged.
Immanuel Kant's View on Human Nature and the Relationship between Nations
Kant's ethics are founded on his view of rationality as the ultimate good and his belief that all people are fundamentally rational beings. This led to the most important part of Kant's ethics, the formulation of the categorical Immanuel Kant: The Existence Of True Enlightenmentwhich is the criterion for whether a maxim is good or bad. Simply put, this criterion amounts to a thought experiment : to attempt to universalize the maxim by imagining a world where all people necessarily acted in this way in the relevant circumstances and then see if the maxim and its associated action would still be conceivable in such a world. For instance, holding the maxim kill anyone who annoys you and applying it universally would result in self termination. Thus holding this maxim is irrational as it ends up being impossible to hold it.
Universalizing a maxim statement leads to it being valid, or to one of two contradictions—a contradiction in conception where the maxim, when universalized, is no longer a viable means to the end or a contradiction in will where the will of a person contradicts what the universalisation of the maxim implies.
How Did Immanuel Kant Contribute To The Shaping Of The International System And The United Nations
The first type leads to a "perfect duty", and the second leads to an "imperfect duty". Kant's ethics focus, then, only on the maxim that underlies actions, and judges these to be good or bad solely on how they conform to reason. Kant showed that many of our common sense views of what is good or bad conform to his Emlightenment, but denied that any action performed for reasons other than rational actions can be good saving someone who is drowning simply out of a great pity for them is not a morally good act.
Kant also denied that the consequences of an act in any way contribute to the moral worth of that act, his reasoning being highly simplified for brevity that the physical world is outside our full control, and thus we cannot be held accountable for the events that occur in it. The formulations of the categorical imperative : Act only according to that maxim whereby you can, at the same time, will that it should become a universal law. For example, John Rawls [4] [5] drew heavily on his inspiration in setting out the basis for a liberal view of political institutions.]
One thought on “Immanuel Kant: The Existence Of True Enlightenment”