Happy, Roko Belic Analysis - good
This article completely mischaracterizes the beliefs of most of the people quoted or referenced, then engages with those beliefs only via asserting the opposite without any supporting argument. I'm disappointed. Singer and other effective altruist philosophers believe that their most likely customers find institutional reform too complicated and political action too impersonal and hit and miss to be attractive. Interestingly, the author quotes part of Singer providing an argument against the effectiveness of institutional reform, but does not himself provide an argument for it, just an assertion that political change is "the most obvious and powerful tool we have. Instead, he jumps straight to accusing Singer of arguing in bad faith. This is actually the opposite of charitable. Ord and MacAskill co-founded an organization, 80, Hours[1], which advocates mostly not for effective giving which the author derides as a "consumer hero" approach but rather for spending your career working on one of the world's most pressing problems; notably including for instance several types of policy change. You could argue that is classic Consumer Hero advice. I know you qualified your statement but I just want to emphasize it as I think it leaves room for criticism. I don't think criticizing effective altruism based on the assertion that it's mostly about earning-to-give is reasonable given those numbers or the framing in 80k's "key ideas" post. HappySubscribe to Email List Subscribe to the Police Blotter email list: By participating on this list the Wisconsin Public Records Laws may subject your email address to disclosure to third parties.
By selecting "Yes" you are requesting that we treat your email address that you have Roko Belic Analysis to this list as confidential and you are also stating that you would not participate in this service if the City is obligated to release aHppy email address to such third party requesters. Yes, keep my information confidential.
No, do not keep my information confidential. Subscribe Please do not enter anything in this field, its purpose is to stop unwanted submissions. Posts By Month.]
I think, that you have deceived.
I would like to talk to you on this theme.
It agree, rather useful idea
I am very grateful to you. Many thanks.